Chelsea vs Arsenal - Arsenal tactical analysis |
Arsenal have a strong defense which looks rather strange as they are used to having defensive vulnerabilities. They have conceded the least number of goals in the Premier League along with Chelsea. The only weak point of the Arsenal defense are their flanks. Crosses are very common at the Arsenal box and they just keep coming in; but thanks to Mertesacker most of these corners are well dealt with.
The fullbacks are not really that good despite Jenkinson showing great amounts of improvement in his play. If Hazard, Mata, Oscar and Ramires are to start, then expect the fullbacks to face huge amounts of pressure throughout the game and they'll hopefully succumb to it.
Koscielny might be chosen as Vermaelen has become used to moving up the pitch. Chelsea can exploit this area and if Arsene Wenger does chose Koscielny over Mertesacker, he has someone who can cover the space left. Mertesacker also lacks pace which gives Wenger another reason to pick the French defender.
The Arsenal midfield has been left largely unaffected with the loss of Song to Barcelona due to Wenger making smart decisions of pairing Diaby and Arteta to provide good cover for the back four. Arteta has brilliant defensive qualitites, despite being a deep lying playmaker.
Diaby on the other hand uses his strength to stop threatening attacks. Ramires can use his pace against him and draw quite a lot of fouls in the middle of the pitch.
Podolski and Ramsey are probably the most flexible players on the pitch. Despite their obvious contributions to attack, they track back in time to give in their share of defensive duties
The Arsenal attack is the most dangerous area that Chelsea have to be wary of. Santi Cazorla is arguably one of the best signings in the English Premier League , adding much needed quality to the Arsenal attacking third.
Cazorla has the habit of drifting a lot to the left where he finds Podloski with clever passes. The Spanish- German combination has worked brilliantly for the Gunners and Terry and Ivanovic (if they're to start) will have to keep up their high levels of concentration to stop anything that threatens Petr Cech's goal.
Keiran Gibbs will be ever-present on the left wing and by putting in Ramires in right midfield behingd Ivanovic, Di Matteo can ensure that the Arsenal left flank is well guarded whereas Jenkinson is much more reserved on the right.
If Giroud is to start he can be pretty dangerous with his all-rounder abilities. Arsene Wenger might even start Gervinho in a false 9 position, freeing acres of space for Podloski and Cazorla to exploit.
Mikel will play a very important role in breaking up attacks as Robin Van Persie and Theo Walcott exploited spaces between the defenders at the Bridge last year.
So what will Chelsea have to do to stop them?
In my opinion, this formation should be heavily considered by Roberto Di Matteo to stop Arsenal.
Cole and Ivanovic will be a integral part of our attack. Personally, I would prefer Cesar, as he is much more attack minded but with Ivanovic's physicality , Di Matteo might opt him.
Mikel and Lampard can be chosen due to Ramires shifting to right. Mikel will be very important and hopefully he can cope up with the pressure. Lampard will probably be given the task of denying Cazorla any kind of space with which we can literally close Arsenal's attack in the center.
Ramires starting on the right wing has left almost everyone, including me, baffled. He offered nothing there and made an instant impact while starting in the center against Stoke City. But against Arsenal, he HAS to start on the right. He provides brilliant defensive cover for the center midfielders, stops major attacks from the right flank and can use his pace brilliantly against the defenders.
Hazard and Mata, will have to try to open up Torres, who will be having a tough afternoon but with proper patience anything can happen.
A big day for John Terry is arriving. Stick with him, show him your love and sing "There is only one England captain ! "
I think its time we just go and play our game and let the opposition worry about stopping us. All we need is just a collective defending when not with the ball. I would prefer we play with some proper width as Danny showed last season. We don't need to rush Terry because this game needs a high level of concentration and Lampard can start from the bench. My preferred team would be Torres(CF) Hazard/Marin(AML) Oscar/Mata(AMC) Moses(AMR) Mikel(DM) Ramires(CM) Cole(WBL) Luiz(DC) Cahill(DC) Ivanovic(WBR) Cech(GK).
ReplyDeletePlaying our game can be one way but we also have to counter specific threats.
DeleteDanny doesn't look like he'll be use don the wing. We have Mata, Oscar and Hazard for that. Plus we'll have to wait for the press conference later today to see whether he's back from injury.
Agree with rushing Terry point !
Maybe the Stoke formation can work out. Have to wait and see !
The problem with countering specific threats is that we would have to field defensive players all over the field which is counter productive to our own game play while the opposition comes on us naturally and dominates. Remember the impact it had on Torres against QPR. I mentioned Sturidge impact on the wing last season to show why we should add a wide player to the team. Arsenal's strength of wide players is also their weakness as was discovered against Manu last season. We must not get too carried away with their strength, forgetting our own. I know wenger is a good Manager but I would be more scared if he had our team. I just hate to be punished with what I have in abundance. Against Ath Madrid, it was obvious we needed strength and width in the team, yet Sturidge and Moses were on the bench giving everyone a false quality of Chelsea while Falcao and their wide players ran the show. Ill keep my fingers crossed on RDM.
DeleteI wouldn't say exactly everywhere. The formation I listed is pretty simillar to previous one's where it has not exactly worked properly for us. To play against Arsenal we have to hit on the break, counter with lot of pace. Ramires gives us pace.
DeleteQPR and Arsenal are different teams, so wouldn't be right to compare them right?
Arsenal have changed from last season, with Podolski, Ramsey and Cazorla moving towards the flanks, they have very good wide players. RDM made minor mistakes against Athletico but we could have won it , if we were not complacent.
I agree that Ramires gives us pace on the right wing, but Moses would give us even more. Betrand also gives us pace on the left wing but using both Betrand and Ramires on the wings would be counter productive to our own new tradition and it would would take us back to last season where we played to the strength of the opposition, not to their weakness, nor our strength. If you have watched Chelsea and Arsenal lately, you will discover that Chelsea need a fast CM who is also a good tackler of the ball to play along side Mikel to create stability in the midfield while Diaby is a revelation for Arsenal driving through the middle with pace which is why we must play Ramires in his natural position. I believe our defensive coach has the responsibility of instructing our forward players on how to defend just like Arsenal. We don't have to play our players out of position unless we are far inferior to the opposition.
DeleteHope RDM and the coaches get that !
DeleteNice piece Sherry. The team selection from the above writer is also in line. Hope we win tomorrow.
ReplyDeleteJT-CAPTAIN, LEADER, LEGEND
Kenechi-Lagos, Nigeria.
Nice write up indeed! :)
DeleteThanks once again guys !
DeleteI disagree with that line up and formation.. I think the line up and formation we used against stoke city will be the best option... Then Lampard, Moses n Marin coming in as Subtitutes.... Lets allow John terry to rest for now please. Odey Sunday Onah A.K.A STRENGTH! D CHELSEA MASTER. Chelsea all the way!
ReplyDeleteStoke and Arsenal are different opposition. We have to field sides based on that. We cant possibly field the team that won 6-0 against Wolves vs United right?
DeleteArsenal has different strengths and weakness , compared to Arsenal. RDM was spot on against Stoke and he can be spot on against Arsenal by using a different formation.
I have a problem with Lampard and Mikel pairing. We don't usually play to our true strenght each time they are paired. I prefer Mikel and Rami in the holding midfield as both of them are full of energy.
ReplyDeleteWe are seeing different sets of team here . Against Arsenal it looks like we will need Lampard to stop Cazorla.
DeleteAgainst Juventus we had Oscar to stop Pirlo. Pirlo deeper so Oscar who was AMF could control him.
Against Arsenal, Cazorla plays an AMF role. So we need someone in a deeper role to stop him. As Mikel is busy covering for everyone, we need someone who can spend 90 minutes in the middle and not drift wide. If Lampard plays he wont go right, but Ramires will.
Dude.. U really shld get a coaching license,ve been following Chelsea FC 360 since ...for up to 3 months now,and I am proud of you men.... Good Job...
ReplyDeleteReal thanks mate !
DeleteI'll definitely do that in 3-4 years :D
I totally disagree with that line-up, how can u play Ramires on the ryt again? After he has constantly shown how bad he can be when playing that role, we have Moses who in my opinion should be Chelsea's weapon against a Gibbs who's very attack-minded, Moses is skillful and very deadly in one beat one situations, he's fast stronge and quite agile. He would also be an asset should Chelsea decide to play on the counter, common am I the only person seeing this? lampard does not posses the tactical discipline to play a deep-lying midfield role, so i'll suggest a Mikel Ramires combination, with Hazard, Mara and Moses behind Torres.
DeleteSir its in view of the team. Every team has a different style of play. You have to understand that first !
DeleteLampard and Ramires were used wrongly against other teams but by using them in this way we can stop all outlets. Moses is good but his defensive abilities is not that good. Ramires gives us more option.
It's not all about attack !
I think ur missing the point, I don't think u watched Moses while he was in Wigan, Wigan play a 4-5-1 formation with Moses Nd Shaun Maloney providing support for Di Santo, that formation requires a lot of defensive work and Moses did that pretty well. One more thing, I believe the best form of defense is attack, why should a club of Chelsea's calibre play a Ramires out of position cause we are too scared of what Arsenal may or may not do? Lampard and Mikel in midfield will be a disaster, likewise Ramires on the right wing, we need to play like we want to win and not curtail Arsenal, common!!!
DeleteMoses was good for Wigan but this is a side that plays different kind of football. Well we will see what happens. Mark my words, it wont end up good.
DeleteMoses is a good player and Chelsea are now playing beautiful football like Wigan did. You just have to look at how he plays in his position, to what extent he does what is required of the position.
DeleteSo u don't think Moses is good enuf to start for chelsea?
DeleteI'm not saying he's not good enough.
DeleteWe need him against teams where we can exploit width due to their defensive vulnerabilities. If Ramires does not start on the right , then Arsenal will exploit our defensive vulnerabilities ! His pace can really help us there but against Arsenal we need a structured midfield with enough cover both on the right and middle to keep out Gibbs and Cazorla.
Moses can attack and can defend for Wigan but the way he defends is different for Wigan and for Chelsea. Thats what I meant by different kind of football. Did not mean that he is not good enough. Sorry if you took it that way !
Sherry, u don't have to apologise to me, we are only debating on what's best for Chelsea, RDM has the final say in the end.
DeleteNo mate, just incase it hurt anyone's feeling :)
DeleteYeah RDM does have the final say in the end but while writing this peice , a part of me wanted RDM to start with the Stoke formation but I purely wrote this on a tactical way. Countering specific threats with decent options, regardless of their recent form .
Cech , Cahil , luiz , Ivanovic , Mikel , Ramires , Mata , Hazard , Oscar , Torres. Let Lampard coming for Mikel close to end d game , 70mins tired Mata for my beloved Moses , hopefully Sturidge or Marin for Torres 80min provided if not in good form as usual then d formation change to false 9. Let Terry start his ban frm 2moro n also for some mental rest n fitness purpose. Thanks admin for giving me opportunity to express my opinion. Ktbffh
ReplyDeleteIn my candid opinion lets stick 2 the formation we used against Stoke. Its a close context but i forsee us grabing a win or draw at emirates.
ReplyDeleteRight. I see alot of debating and I like it. It brings something extra to the site. I would like us to field our strongest side against a potent free flowing Arsenal side. It might not be a good idea to place a full attacking side while we are just about gelling but Arsenal won't be sitting back like our previous lesser opponents did. Placing a side with Torres,Hazard,Mata and Oscar/Moses upfront might be usefull when we counter attack with accurate one twos or looking to keep the ball at times. Both teams are feeling great after demolishing their opponents in the Capital One Cup. It should be a cracking game of attacking football.
ReplyDeleteVery true ! We will be having this debate before every tactical preview of mine ! :D
DeleteI agree with your points, very different from what we talked about , especially the gelling point and Arsenal's stature.
Bearing in mind that this Chelsea squad is not as free flowing as Arsenal, at least not at the moment, don't u think trying to match them in the middle may be counter productive? In my humble opinion, I think our best chance of winning this game is playing to the strengths of our players, inventive and quick conter attacks may jes do the trick, that's why i'm clamouring for moses, cause I know he'll take Gibbs to the cleaners. Pace and skill are key components that must be in our play tomorrow or else? I know we still Athletico Madrid in our memories and Arsenal are even more fluid than athletico Madrid, even if they don't have a Falcao, they have a Podolski who's also very clinical.
DeleteWell we can definitely go with that.
DeletePlaying with our strengths is one definite option and what I listed above is just a possibility. If we do use that kind of approach we can have the game in the bag as well !
I cannot believe that you put Ramires on right wing and the Mikel-Lampard system. Are you kidding me?? You spend a lot time say that Ramirez on the right wing is NOT good and the Mikel-Lampard system doesnt work. Now RDM starts to understand this fact and now he has to go back with the old system who doesnt work? Unbelievable!
ReplyDeleteI used that for a different set of team. Against Stoke it was utterly impossible to play Ramires on thr right and the Mikel Lampard combination would not work against them.
DeleteBut after watching each and every Arsenal game TWICE this season, I realized we need Ramires on the right to provide cover in the center and right. We need to direct lot of play through the middle where Arsenal are more susceptible.
I think the system of false "9" will be great:
Deleteiva - cahil - terry - cole
Lampard/mikel - rami
oscar - mata - hazards
Moses
With this team 100% to win because torres is usless: it is like we play with 10 players. Against Arsenal, it is impossible to win with torres.
4 goals in 8 games, mate. He looks out of sorts but he have to keep faith in him !
DeleteThe false 9 is a huge possibility and Torres played false 9 against Stoke at the end of second half, constantly dropping deep as a playmaker and giving space for others. Played a huge part in Ashley Cole finding himself in the box !
The double pivot is a difficult one to debate about. In my opinion,I'd like to see Ramires partnering Mikel because they look to be doing a better job together. The role of holding mids is to provide cover in the middle of the park for the centre backs but that's not all. They have to also assist the fullbacks by stopping incutting wingers (Ramires for Cazorla/Podolski and Mikel for Gervinho/Walcott/Carzola) so it definitely won't be easy penetrating our box if we stay disciplined and focused. Lampard is obviously to slow and not agile enough for this position but I think he can be used effectively. What if RDM considers a 4-3-3 system that performed well against a midfield packed and known fluid passing Juventus. It's a good option in my opinion. We all know Lampard will play so we place him as an advanced left centre middle. Mikel and the holding middle. Ramires(box to box) as a right centre middle. Picking the next three attackers is difficult. We could bence Torres and play Oscar as a false 9 since he can play a centre front role,not striker with Mata left and Hazard to his right. Oscar likes to drop deep to get the ball or to draw opponent defenders out so he could be effective making space for a pacey Ramires or allowing Hazard to make an attacking run in the box. The options are there. It's up to Robbie because he has the squad to pick a dangerous starting eleven. Let's hope it isn't negative.
ReplyDeletePlease excuse my spelling errors.
DeleteWow, lovely. I love dis. This shows we all love our dear Chelsea. One thing you should know is that, there is a certain Formation for a certain term. I WISH OUR CHELSEA ALL THE BEST TOMORO. From Arthur Osadebe
ReplyDeletePls Sherry send me your email contact to my email arthurosadebe@yahoo.com
ReplyDelete