Are Tottenham more suited to AVB’s style than Chelsea were |
When AVB joined Chelsea he had a bunch of
players that did not suit his system tactically. Villas Boas and Roman
both wanted free flowing, quick football. Something similar to what Pep
Guardiola was doing at Barcelona in Spain. Pep certainly had the players
who could quite easily do what he wanted out of them, but at Chelsea
things were different. Chelsea were quite used to playing the old
fashioned football what Mourinho had instated at that club during his
tenure. The plan was simple clear heads while defending and long balls
while attacking. Villas Boas tried to change all this a bit too early.
He tried to put forward a system the players were not used to, certainly
pleasing to watch but if the players can’t adjust then things can go a
bit ugly an that’s what happened at Chelsea. The High Line in the
defense and the quick passing was something the players were not used
to.
So what is so different at Spurs that AVB can succeed here?
In Harry’s 4-4-1-1 he made sure that Spurs
were not outplayed in the midfield with Lennon and Bale providing good
attacking options from the flanks with their pace and trickery. The only
problem Harry faced at times was VdV’s lack of involvement when he ran
out of stamina, but Harry was quick to change things using his subs
wisely. Harry’s downfall at Spurs came when he was “reportedly” linked
to England’s job. With Harry’s mind more focused at what lied ahead
rather than what he had Spurs parted ways with him.
On came the enthusiastic Andre Villas Boas.
Premier League had already seen a bit of AVB during his time at Chelsea
but has he saved his best for Spurs?
AVB was quick to make changes at Spurs.
Harry’s 4-4-1-1 was changed to 4-2-3-1 something similar to what he was
using at Chelsea. But did he have the players this time around?
Assessing the transfer window-
1. Gylfi Sigurdsson- One of the main
problems Harry faced last season was Van Der Vaart’s lack of link up
play later on in the game due, Villas Boas was quick to replace him with
one of last season’s break out player Sigurdsson. Sigurdsson is 7 yrs
younger than VdV and offers more offensively as well as defensively to
this Spurs side. The Icelandic was phenomenal last season for Swansea
and was a decent buy considering the fact he settled in well in
Swansea’s high line tactics last season something AVB was used to
playing.
2. Adebayor- Adebayor was signed by Spurs
after completing his loan spell at the club last season. The Togolese
striker who was reluctant to take a wage drop finally agreed to move
from Man City where he was surplus to requirements at the club. The
Togolese striker was immense for Spurs last season and with shortage in
attacking options Adebayor could be a top signing.
3. Dembele- One of the most sought after
young talents finally decided to move to Spurs. After “rumored” interest
from the likes of Madrid,Chelsea,Liverpool Dembele found Spurs as his
ideal location considering the fact the amount of game time he could get
in that team now that Modric had left the club.
4. Lloris- With Brad Friedel not getting any
younger, Villas Boas decided to break the bank for French
international Hugo Lloris. The highly experienced goalkeeper not only
provides another decent option in the goal but also a long term
replacement for Friedel whose days of retirement are edging closer.
5. Dempsey- Another deadline day signing was
Fulham’s Clint Dempsey. After being tracked by Liverpool throughout the
summer window quite surprisingly Dempsey decided to move to Sours
seeing Liverpool unable to match Fulham’s demands. Dempsey provides
another quality option in the attacking third.
6. Jan Verthongen- Following Ledley King’s
retirement and Kaboul’s injury issues, Villas Boas finally decided to
complete the move for long term target Jan Verthongen from Ajax. The
Belgian fits in the high line tactic comfortably for Spurs. With age by
his side and decent speed he was without doubt one of AVB’s best signing
in this window.
So how do the following players fit in the AVB system?
Well Villas Boas came with one idea in mind
when he joined Spurs, that was to change the whole complexion of the
team. With the side losing 2 of its standout players in King, Modric and
VdV, Villas Boas knew he had to fill some big holes in that side.
Unlike Chelsea, he high line tactic at Spurs could be a big hit, here is
why- At Chelsea Villas Boas faced the problem of having slow sluggish
defenders who were not only ready to settle in the new tactic but were
not the kind of players who could actually do well in that role. At
Spurs Villas Boas has quick full backs in Assou-Ekotto and Kyle Walker
and with Verthongen’s addition in the CB role the whole idea of playing
the high line just got better. Although yes one might argue that Gallas
might not be the most suitable pair alongside Verthongen but I guess
once Kaboul comes back that defense will look much better.
Now the second major point worth discussing-
the emergence of younger talents rather than a group of players
dominating the dressing room. Villas Boas situation at Chelsea was
something similar to what Brian Clough had at Leeds with most of the
players against him, not ready to settle in with his tactics, stubborn.
Yet unlike Clough, Villas Boas was not going to bow down to them. He
benched many of the “old guards” more than often that led to even more
issues between the manager and the players. This can certainly be
avoided at Spurs. With the likes of Modric, VdV and King leaving the
club, Villas Boas has brought in players that he wanted at the club, the
players that could fit in this system of his. Although there are talks
of Lloris being unhappy at the club but I guess that might be solved as
the season progresses.
At Chelsea another major problem he faced
was that the players were not suited to the style of football both the
owner and he wanted. The owner demanded fast free flowing football and
Chelsea players were not used to playing deep and digging out results.
At Spurs he has the creative flair of Bale and Lennon from the wings and
with Dempsey,Dembele,Defoe supporting the attack Villas
Boas ideology of playing the free flowing football can finally work.
Although one might argue that Villas Boas
has not learnt from his mistakes at Chelsea by selling off key players
like Modric and VdV but to be fair it is better to keep players with
clear minds rather than having unsettled players at the clubs. Though
the club will miss the creative flair of Modric but Dembele who looks
like his replacement in that team certainly has the potential and just
like the manager the players will need time to settle in.
Although it will be unfair to judge Villas
Boas after just 1-2 seasons, but if Levy can keep tabs on that sack
button unlike his compatriot Roman then the emergence of Spurs into a
real powerhouse could get real.
Villas Boas message to the club is simple: Give me time, and I can change things around.
Shikharr Chandra (@ShikharrC)
TweetFollow @CFC360Official
If the article had been proofread it would have been much better. But most of what I can understand is perfectly true. I especially enjoyed your idea that Roman Abramovich might be a compatriot of Daniel Levy.
ReplyDeleteTake more care over what you write in future and your articles will be a hundred times better.
Thank you for the feedback. And sorry for the silly mistakes! Cheers!
DeleteI agree with you on that write up on AVB. He is a young man i love so much, he got the talent, and i think he ll do well at Spur. No coach ll ever do well in an environment where he is not loved or fully backed by the senior players. I wish him all the best. From Arthur Osadebe
ReplyDeleteWell written.
ReplyDeleteAVB is a good coach, no doubt about that, but he came to Chelsea at the wrong time. Everything seemed a drama last season, though. Who would tip Chelsea 2 become Wolrd Champions, that means AVB had shared in the making of the destiny. TMighty from Nigeria
ReplyDelete